Michael N. Metzmaker 2-27-07
Molecular Machines Myosin and Actin
One of the best ways to improve today’s machines, and to come up with completely new ones, is not necessarily by thinking big. As a matter of fact, in recent years, thinking small has become much more important.
Nanotechnology, even though it is a new field, has been researched with great fervor and it shows almost limitless potential. Its scope extends most notably through various fields of medicine, where bionanotechnology is experiencing many breakthroughs. However, it can also be used in other fashions, most notably in ways to aid in the dilemma of energy scarcity in the modern world. Eco-friendly molecular machines could be the key to many of the problems with energy usage across the world. They could create new sources of energy, and new machines to use them. They could generate more efficient forms of already existing processes, such as photo- and chemosynthesis. Others could be modified to work as engines.
Many existing biological molecular machines already work as motors. For example, the molecular walkers, such as dyneins and kinesins pull organelles and vesicles along microtubules inside cells. There are outboard motors with propellers called flagella, and tiny stroking “arms” called cilia, that propel bacteria through solution. All of these have significant applications for nanotechnology. However, one molecular motor has potential to be used at a variety of scales: myosin.
Myosin is a protein involved in one of the most large scale movement mechanisms of the animal kingdom: muscle movement. Every muscle contraction, from the skeletal muscle contraction, which extends the knee while running, to the cardiac muscle contraction of the heart that pumps blood, requires myosin. It is one of the predominant biological molecular machines whose effects can be seen at the macroscopic scale.
Everyone can see how muscles work as a tissue, pulling on joints and causing motion. The way a muscle contraction works at the molecular level, however, is much more complicated. While different types of muscles work in slightly different ways, the molecular processes behind skeletal muscle contraction form the basis of the other types of muscle contraction. The other forms (cardiac and smooth muscle contraction) also use the myosin machine in conjunction with an actin filament, but skeletal muscle’s obvious organization of muscle fibers into sarcomeres is the easiest to see with a microscope. Skeletal muscle is easier to access and stimulate to contract in a lab environment. It has therefore been studied more extensively than the other types of muscle.
Muscles cells are organized into hundreds of thin, cordlike myofibrils, arranged longitudinally, which are sectioned into many cylindrical sarcomeres. Each sarcomere contains the working molecular portions of the muscle, and is the basic contractile unit of the muscle (Figure 1.0). In each sarcomere, under a light microscope, one can see thin filaments and thick filaments, which overlap. This overlap is what allows the sliding filament theory of muscle contraction to work.
The sliding filament theory was proposed by Andrew Huxley in 1969. It is based on the idea that in a sarcomere, there are two types of filaments visible through a microscope. The thick filaments are made up of the bundles of myosin, while the thin filaments are made up of actin. The H-Zone is an area in which there are only myosin filaments, with no overlap of actin. The I-Band is an area containing only actin. The A-Band is the area containing all of the myosin, all the way out to where there is actin overlap. The M-Line is the middle line toward which the myosin heads pull.
At rest, the thick filaments overlap the thin filaments slightly. After partial contraction, they overlap more, and after full contraction the two filaments overlap completely, until they are lined up in a very neat column. The opposite occurs with during relaxation (Figure 1.1).
It seems difficult to believe, but during muscle contraction, no filaments change in length. Instead, molecular interactions within the sarcomere cause the filaments to slide past each other longitudinally, producing an overall shortening and thickening of the tissue.
The interaction of myosin and actin in the presence of ATP (adenosine triphosphate) allows muscles to contract at the molecular level. Each myosin molecule consists of a long tail and a globular head region. All the tails of the separate myosin proteins bundle together in the middle of a sarcomere, and the heads remain at intervals closer to the outside to form the thick filaments. The actin proteins are formed into a twisted double chain of the many globular actin subunits. Each actin has a small space that easily connects to the myosin head called the “myosin-binding site”.
The myosin head is the driving force behind the bioenergetic reaction of the actin-myosin complex. It can bind ATP and hydrolyze it into ADP (adenosine diphosphate) and a Pi (inorganic phosphate). The hydrolysis of ATP raises myosin into a high-energy configuration, so that it can more easily bind to the actin, forming what is called a cross-bridge. Then, as myosin releases ADP and Pi – moving toward its low energy configuration – it slides the actin filament toward the center of the sarcomere. Once this release is complete, the myosin is ready to attach a new ATP and go through the process again (Figure 1.2).
Other structures involved in the process of muscle contraction are tropomyosin and troponin. However, these most likely would not be present in commercial uses of the molecular machine. Tropomyosin is a long, cordlike protein that blocks the myosin binding sites on the actin proteins. It is attached to many troponin molecules that, when bound to calcium ions, pull the tropomyosin off the binding sites, and allow contraction to begin. Therefore, in biological contractions, calcium is crucial for troponin and tropomyosin. Its presence allows the process of muscle contraction to occur (Figure 1.3).
Fortunately, if the molecular machines were engineered correctly, they could be created without the presence of troponin and tropomyosin. Because myosin and actin can be attached to surfaces inexpensively using histidines, it would be very easy to simply omit putting troponin and tropomyosin in the solution prior to attachment. The proteins would be cloned from an organism into bacteria such as E. coli which could then manufacture only the specific protein desired.
It is assumed that a large obstacle in commercializing the use of biological molecular machines is implementing them outside of a cellular or biological environment. Fortunately, this is not necessarily the case. Kinesins have been implemented in vitro since as early as 1985. Several other molecular motors have been implemented outside of biological systems more recently as well.
The actin-myosin complex has great potential for commercial use. It has already been developed into a motor of sorts, and is patented and up for sale to the highest bidder. It involves myosin, attached to a substrate, and actin, attached to another substrate. The motor would require a fuel, but it would be the low cost, low pollution, energy efficient fuel. Simply enough, ATP runs the myosin motor, just like in muscle cells. And, without the added interference of tropomyosin, calcium is not required. The proteins can be attached to a variety of surfaces. Actin, for example, seems to attach nicely to nickel-coated surfaces. Precise lithographic positioning might allow attachment of the proteins in very organized arrangements.
The structure of the motor can vary slightly. The main idea is that the two surfaces – one with actin and one with myosin – would be surfaces of a cylinder. For example, the myosin would probably coat the inner surface of a slightly larger cylinder, and the actin would coat the outer surface of a slightly smaller cylinder. The two surfaces would have to be very close together to allow interaction between the proteins, but far enough apart to allow rotation. The proteins would have to be arranged along the curved surface in such a way to produce a pull all in a predetermined direction. The inner cylinder can then have a gear protruding from one end, which can drive another gear and be involved in powering a very small machine (Figure 1.4). It also has the potential to be scaled up to macroscopic proportions. Also, the inner cylinder could be attached to a variety of other simple machines, such as a pulley system, a propeller, a wheel, or a lever-arm.
The rotational formation provides a huge advantage over the biological sliding filament formation in that relaxation would not have to take place; the gear could be in almost perpetual motion, provided a constant energy source was available. The energy that runs the device would be ATP, which is, of course, an extremely clean and renewable resource. The eco-friendly advantages of ATP as a resource are obvious, including abundance, no pollution, and simple manufacture. The advantage to this particular system is just as important. ATP would have a regulatory effect on the motor in that the concentration of ATP in the system would determine the rate at which it would run. The ATP could simply be flooded into the space between the two cylinders to facilitate rotation.
Potential uses for the motor are wide ranging. They could be used in animals that have had nerve damage and had lost motor function in a limb or digit. It could be used in a robot, to facilitate movement of limbs or any other parts of the machine. The potential of having multiple cylinders built inside one another to make a very large motor gives the machine astronomical potential. It could be used in a car to replace the internal combustion engine. Multiple cylinders being stacked inside of one another could increase the speed of the motor by a huge margin. The imagination is the only limit to the application of this machine.
The molecular machine of the actin-myosin complex has a very useful aspect: cheap motion. Whether discussing its biological properties in muscle contraction or its potential commercial use in driving gears, the machine produces quick motion that is reproducible, inexpensive, efficient, sustainable, and widely applicable. The machine can solve the problems involved with burning fossil fuels in transportation and may protect the environment in years to come.